 & Grade of 29 & Grade of 31 & Student test of equality \\ 
 Proba. to be funded & 0.227 & 0.760 & [p=0.000] \\
 &(0.429) & (0.436) & \\ 
 Share of total grade attributed to \\
 \hspace{1cm} Team quality (crit. 1) & 0.154 & 0.152 & [p=0.644] \\
 &(0.023) & (0.012) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Project's scientific ambition (crit. 2) & 0.143 & 0.142 & [p=0.775] \\
 &(0.017) & (0.018) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Innovation and impact (crit. 3) & 0.138 & 0.136 & [p=0.670] \\
 &(0.021) & (0.016) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Teaching quality (crit. 4) & 0.146 & 0.144 & [p=0.700] \\
 &(0.020) & (0.021) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Management quality (crit. 5) & 0.135 & 0.141 & [p=0.250] \\
 &(0.021) & (0.015) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Partner university joint strategy (crit. 6) & 0.145 & 0.147 & [p=0.700] \\
 &(0.019) & (0.015) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Adequation ambition / funding (crit. 7) & 0.139 & 0.139 & [p=0.916] \\
 Rank \\
 \hspace{1cm} Within discipline & 8.682 & 5.680 & [p=0.000] \\
 &(2.418) & (2.545) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Within region & 16.091 & 17.600 & [p=0.666] \\
 &(12.153) & (11.662) & \\ 
 \hspace{1cm} Within discipline x region & 2.500 & 2.440 & [p=0.914] \\
 &(2.018) & (1.758) & \\ 
 Total proximity & 0.651 & 0.660 & [p=0.921] \\
 &(0.313) & (0.319) & \\ 
 Funding required (log) & 15.870 & 16.408 & [p=0.103] \\
 &(1.538) & (0.476) & \\ 
 Nb of LabEx candidates & r(N1) & r(N2) & = \\
